Election Day is Nov. 6th! There are 12 Amendments, find out about them here!

Amendment 11

Property Rights; Removal of Obsolete Provision; Criminal Statutes

Source: Constitution Revision Commission

Quick Summary: Repeals the state’s ability to prohibit non-citizens from buying, owning and selling property; deletes a provision that forces the state to prosecute criminal suspects under the law they were originally charged under, even if the Legislature changes that law; deletes obsolete language having to do with high-speed rail in Florida.

Full Summary: This question has three parts.

  1. Florida’s Constitution currently has a clause that allows the Florida Legislature to pass laws restricting the property rights of “aliens ineligible for citizenship.” In other words, the Legislature has the authority to prevent non-citizens from owning, inheriting, buying or selling property. Known as “Alien Land Laws,” these restrictions swept the nation in the early 20th century, largely out of fear of the Japanese. Florida’s land-ownership amendment was approved by voters in 1926, but the state currently has no laws on the books restricting the property rights of non-citizens. In 2008, Florida voters rejected an amendment that would have done away with the ownership restrictions, partly because of confusion over its meaning and anti-immigrant sentiment. Amendment 11 is a second attempt to repeal these property-rights restrictions (a CRC analysis of this proposal is here). 
  2. This part of the amendment would affect criminal defendants (a CRC analysis of this proposal is here). Currently, if someone is arrested for a crime, they’ll be prosecuted under the statute that is in effect when the alleged crime was committed. Say a person is arrested on June 30 for a drug crime. Even if a new law took effect the following day that reduced the sentence for the crime, the defendant would be subject to the stricter sentence under the old law. This amendment would ensure that criminal defendants are prosecuted under the most current laws on the books. However, this question does not alter the Constitution’s mandate that if a law is repealed altogether, a person arrested before that repeal could still face prosecution for the crime. 
  3. The third part of this amendment deletes language about high-speed transportation (a CRC analysis of this proposal is here). In 2000, Floridians approved an amendment that mandated building some type of high-speed ground transportation. Four years later, voters overturned that amendment but the language about high-speed transportation wasn’t removed from the Constitution. This amendment would do that.

A YES vote on Amendment 11 would:

  • Repeal a nearly century-old provision that allows the Legislature to restrict the property rights of non-citizens.
  • Deletes language that requires criminal suspects to be prosecuted under the provisions of the law they’re accused of breaking, even if that law is changed by the Legislature. Keeps language that requires prosecution if the law is repealed.
  • Deletes a section of the Constitution – concerning high-speed transportation – that was repealed by voters in 2004. The language, however, was not removed.

Supporters:

Florida Chamber of Commerce

A No vote on Amendment 11 would:

  • Continue to allow the Legislature to pass laws restricting the property rights of non-citizens.
  • Continue to mandate that criminal suspects prosecuted under the law they’re accused of breaking even if the state changes that law.
  • Retain a section of the Constitution about high-speed transportation even though voters repealed that section in 2004.

Opponents:

P.O. Box 1911 Orlando, FL 32802-1911

Orlando Web Design by CREATE180 Design